SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1452

R.RAMANUJAM, S.B.SINHA, V.V.S.RAO
K. Venkat Rao – Appellant
Versus
Rockwool (India) Limited, Hyderabad – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) WHETHER an application filed by a director of a Company before a Company judge challenging a notice in terms whereof his shares were directed to be forfeited and he was directed to vacate the office, can be entertained by this Court is the question involved in this petition. REASONS FOR REFERENCE:

( 2 ) A learned Company Judge having noticed two conflicting decisions in m/s. Nizamabad Corn Products Pvt. Ltd. , v. Vasudev Dalia and in Avanthi Explosives v. Principal Subordinate Judge as regards jurisdiction of this Court to entertain such petition, referred the matter for a decision by appropriate Bench. When the matter was listed before a Division Bench of this Court, it having regard to the importance of the question involved in the matter referred the matter, to Full Bench by an order dated 17-10-2001. FACTS:

( 3 ) THE petitioner herein by reason of the impugned notices was declared to have ceased to be a Director of the first respondent company with effect from 21-7-2001 in terms of Sec. 283 (l) (f) of the companies Act on the ground that he had failed to deposit the call money of the shares. The said decision was communicated to him by notice dated 30-8-2



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top