SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1515

B.S.A.SWAMY
L. Sathyanarayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
L. A. O. , (R. D. O. ), Chittoor – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) QUESTIONING the orders of the Additional senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi, in E. A. No. 322 of 2001 in O. E. P. No. 26 of 1990 in O. P. No. 83 of 1982 dated 10th July, 2001 in refusing to release the compensation to the legal heirs of one late L. Kumaraswamy on the ground that no succession certificate was produced, the present revision petition is filed.

( 2 ) HEARD both the Counsel.

( 3 ) THE facts are not in dispute. The lands of late Kumara Swamy along with others were acquired for a public purpose and the matter seemed to have went up to Supreme court with regard to the quantum of compensation payable for the lands that were acquired and it attained finality. Thereafter some disputes seemed to have arisen between the legal heirs of late kumara Swamy and the female heirs of late kumara Swamy filed O. S. No. 60 of 2001 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, tirupati and ultimately the matter was settled in Lok Adalat and an award was also passed by the Lok Adalat. After obtaining the award in Lok Adalat, the legal heirs approached the Senior Civil Judge for disbursement of the compensation to them as per the Award. But the Senior Civil Judge dismissed





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top