SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1521

R.M.BAPAT
O. R. Alavi – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER herein is accused No. 1 in C. C. No. 126/1995 pending on the file of Judicial magistrate Of First Class, Huzurnagar, nalgonda. He along with A-2 was initially prosecuted for offences punishable under sections 408, 467 and 420 I. P. C. The offences are alleged to have been committed in between 9-6-1990 and 3-8-1990. Charge- sheet was filed on 29-1-1995.

( 2 ) BEFORE taking cognizance of the offences in question, accused persons filed a crl. M. P. No. 2267/1995 for discharging them under Section 239 Cr. P. C. The matter was heard by the learned Judge on merits and he came to the conclusion that by reading the averments made in the charge- sheet, no offence punishable under Sections 467, 420 and 408 I. P. C. was disclosed. However, the learned Judge held that the facts on record would reveal that the accused persons were liable to be punished for offences punishable under Sections 403 and 406 I. P. . C. The learned Judge discharged the accused of the offences punishable under sections 467, 420 and 408 I. P. C. and took cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 403 and 406 I. P. C.

( 3 ) THE present petition is filed by A-l raising contention







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top