SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1387

G.BIKSHAPATHY
Rampati Satya Harichandra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Atkuri Venkatanarayana – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE revision is filed against the order dated 20. 7. 2001 passed by the court of Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur in i. A. No. 865 of 2001 in A. S. No. 31 of 2001.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff in O. S. No. 218 of 1995 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior civil Judge, Kovvur, is the petitioner herein. The above suit was filed for declaration of easementary right and for consequential perpetual injunction. The trial Court after considering the respective contentions of the parties decreed the suit by judgment and decree dated 14. 6. 2001; against which appeal - A. S. No. 31 of 2001 - has been filed by the defendant, respondent herein. He had also filed an application in I. A. No. 865 of 2001 for stay and suspension of the execution of the decree dated 14. 6. 2001 in o. S. No. 218 of 1995. The appellate Court, after considering the matter, allowed the said application by order dated 20. 7. 2001; against which, the present revision has been filed.

( 3 ) AT the outset, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the very grant of slay of the injunction decree is illegal and contrary to the provisions laid down under Order XLI, Rule 5 of the Civil procedure Code









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top