SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1390

V.V.S.RAO, S.B.SINHA, S.R.NAYAK
P. Manjula – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal A. P. , Hyd. – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) BOTH these appeals involving common questions of law and facts were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The petitioners in the writ petitions are the appellants. Facts in Writ Appeal No. 983 of 1999;

( 2 ) THE appellant herein was holder of stage carriage permit on town service route kintali to Collectorate in the town of srikakulam. The said route was subsequently varied as Collectorate to pillalavalasa on 26-2-1985: For the said purpose, prior permission of the Transport commissioner, Hyderabad is required under Rule 282 (2) (ii) of the Andhra pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1964 (for short "1964 Rules"), which is equivalent to rule 258 (2) (ii) of the Andhra Pradesh motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (for short "1989 rules" ). Such prior permission is required if the town service route is varied to such an extent that it would be beyond eight kilometres from the municipal limits.

( 3 ) THE permit was transferred in favour of the appellant on 23-5-1987. By reason of an order dated 11-11-1987, the said permit was cancelled by the second respondent in implementation of the approved scheme in g. O. Ms. Nos. 1093 and 1094 dat















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top