SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1397

BILAL NAZKI, ELIPE DHARMA RAO
Modern High School, Zamisthanpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , Education Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) THESE Writ Petitions raise common questions of law and fact as in all petitions vires of G. O. Ms. No. 76, dated 2-11-99 has been challenged.

( 2 ) THE admitted facts are that, the petitioner institutions are minority educational institutions. Some of these institutions are admitted to grant-in-aid by the Government and some of them are unaided institutions. In terms of powers conferred on the Government under Sec. 99 of the A. P. Educational Institutions Act, 1982 rules were framed by the Government being g. O. Ms. No. 1, Education (P. S. 2) department, dated 1-1-94. Rule 12 of these rules deals with the appointment of the staff. By virtue of G. O. Ms. No. 76 dated 2-11-99 rule 12 was amended retrospectively with effect from 5-8-98. The amendment to rule 12 is challenged in all these writ petitions as illegal. It is contended that the impugned G. O. contravenes the right of managements of the Educational institutions guaranteed under Article 30 (1) of the constitution of India.

( 3 ) THE short question before this Court is, whether the impugned G. O. is depriving the managements of the institutions rights guaranteed under Article 30 (1) of the constitution. I








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top