SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1634

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Areti Maramma – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Secunderabad – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision under Section 115 of the code of Civil Procedure is filed against the order of the learned Senior Civil Judge, rajole in E. A. No. 77 of 2000 in E. P. No. 12 of 1999 in O. S. No. 51 of l993.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts may be briefly stated as under: respondents 2, 3 and 4 borrowed certain amounts from the 1st respondent. They deposited the title deeds in respect of the property in R. S. No. 42/1 of Kattimanda village admeasuring 35 cents towards security and thereby created equitable mortgage in favour of the 1st respondent. Since the amount was not paid, the 1st respondent filed O. S. 51/93 against respondents 2,3 and 4. After the contest, the suit was decreed and a preliminary decree was passed for sale of the mortgaged property granting time for redemption. Since respondents 2, 3 and 4 failed to pay the amount within the time granted for redemption, steps were taken by the 1st respondent by filing E. P. 12/99 to bring the property to sale in accordance with the preliminary decree.

( 3 ) AT that stage, the petitioner herein filed E. A. 77 of 2000 under Section 47 read with Section 151 CPC claiming that the property in question was conveyed

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top