SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1539

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, V.V.S.RAO
New Bhoiguda Mosque and Grave Yard Committee – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Hyderabad – Respondent


AR. LAKSHMANAN, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal is directed against the order dated 18-6-2001, passed by a learned Judge of this Court, dismissing the writ petition being WP No. 4376 of 1990, filed by the appellant, impugning the notification dated 12-4-1984 issued by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (for short the Corporation ), in purported exercise of his power under Section 3 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Slum Improvement (Acquisition of Land) Act, 1956 (for short the Act ), proposing to acquire an extent of 3000 Sq. yds. of land.

( 2 ) THE appellant claims to be the owner and possessor of an extent of Ac. 1-24 guntas of land in Sy. No. 887, being the Wakf property. Before the learned single Judge, it was contended on behalf of the petitioner-appellant that before issuing the impugned notification, no notice as contemplated under Section 2 (3) of the Act was issued to the petitioner, and that the impugned notification is contrary to the spirit of the judgment, dated 21-4-1987, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in WP No. 8331 of 1981.

( 3 ) THE learned single Judge, on the first point held that it is clearly stated in the counter that notice calling fo









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top