SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1559

BILAL NAZKI, L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Arun Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Bin. Aaha Sharma – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE two appeals arise out of common judgment of the Court of the II Additional judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, in o. S. Nos. 355 and 581 of 1993. The Civil revision Petition arises out of order passed by that Court in I. A. No. 401/97 in o. S. No. 581/93. The appellants in both the appeals are the plaintiffs in O. S. No. 355 and defendants in O. S. No. 581 of 1993. They are also respondents in LA. No. 401 /97. For the sake of convenience, the appellants are referred to as the plaintiffs and the respondents as defendants.

( 2 ) ONE Dr. Ayendra Sharma and his wife smt. Nirmala Devi Sharma had two sons and three daughters. The 1st plaintiff mr. Arun Kumar Sharma and the 2nd defendant Mr. Uday Kumar Sharma are their sons. The 1st defendant Mrs. Asha sharma, the 3rd defendant Mrs. Rekha amamath and the 4th defendant Mrs. Maya badrinath are their daughters. Smt. Nirmala devi owned and possessed immovable properties viz. , one big house and one small house over an area of 934. 44 sq. yards at domalguda and a plot of 1153 sq. mts, at banjara Hills. Dr. Ayendra Sharma appears to have died long back whereas smt. Nirmala Devi died in April 1989.

( 3 ) THE 1st






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top