SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1552

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
K. Pavan – Appellant
Versus
Special Executive Magistrate, Office of the Collector and District agistrate, Hyderabad – Respondent


P. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in the instant writ petition prays for issuance of an appropriate writ, particularly, one in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to preserve the disputed property bearing No. 10-2-91/87, road No. 3, West Marredpally, secunderabad as per the proceedings of the first respondent in M. C. No. B/60/1989, dated 12-6-1995. The petitioner also prays for issuance of appropriate directions to initiate action against the persons responsible for changing the nature of the property.

( 2 ) THERE is any amount of dispute between the parties in respect of the property aring No. 10-2-91/87, Road No. 3, West marredpally, Secunderabad (for short the said property ). The petitioner and respondents 6,7 and 8 exclusively claim the proprietary rights over the said property. Even according to the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the said property belongs to one late smt. P. Anjanamma, widow of late Guru swamy Naidu. The said Anjanamma had five sons and two daughters. The petitioner is the son of the eldest daughter-late smt. Lalitha w/o. late K. Rama Krishna. The said Anjanamma is alleged to have executed a Wil























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top