SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1572

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, V.V.S.RAO
Nimmagadda Krishna Hari – Appellant
Versus
Manepalli Mangamma – Respondent


A. R. LAKSHMANAN, C. J.

( 1 ) THE matter arises under the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) control Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). C. R. P. No. 3592 of 2000 was filed by the unsuccessful tenants in both the courts below. The husband of the first petitioner was the tenant in the schedule premises and during the lifetime of the original tenant, certain disputes arose between the landlord and the tenant and the tenant filed O. S. No. 422 of 1990 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif, vijayawada for injunction against the respondent and the same was decreed on 31-3-1994. The tenant also filed R. C. C. No. 98 of 1990 under Section 8 (5) of the act seeking permission to deposit the rent into the Court. The said petition was filed on 6-7-1990 and the same was allowed on 20-6-1991. Subsequent thereto on 5-8-1992, the original tenant died and the first petitioner being the wife and the second petitioner being the daughter were added as the legal representatives in O. S. No. 422 of 1990. Inasmuch as the proceedings in r. C. C. NO. 98 of 1990 were terminated even by 20-6-1991, R. C. C. No. 1 of 1993 was filed under Section 8 (5) of the Act for depos
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top