SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1586

G.YETHIRAJULU, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
General Manager, South Central Railway, Secbad – Appellant
Versus
Kotaiah – Respondent


AR. LAKSHMANAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by the General manager, South Central Railway and 3 others for a mandamus restraining the 2nd respondent herein, who was appointed as arbitrator in Arbitration Application No. 55 of 2001 by order dated 1-10-2001, from functioning as an Arbitrator to resolve the disputes by way of arbitration proceedings in respect of Contract Agreement No. 107 den/c/bg/sc/92-93 dated 3-8-1992 as his appointment is illegal, contrary to law and void as per Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) WE have perused the order passed by J. Chelameswar, J. , in AA No. 55 of 2001. This order was passed after hearing the Counsel for the Contractor and the learned Counsel for Railways. Since there was an arbitration agreement between the parties, which was also not in dispute, the learned Judge after hearing the Counsel appearing on either side referred the matter to be resolved by the process of arbitration. The learned Judge appointed a former Judge of this Court Sri M. Ranga Reddy, J. , as the arbitrator reserving liberty to him to fix his remuneration. The correctness of this order is





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top