SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1575

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ELIPE DHARMA RAO
SHAIK ZAHEER – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure to quash the judgment of both the Courts below passed in STC No. 286 of 1999 on the file of the learned XIV metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad to the extent of confiscation of the seized amount and the judgment passed in Criminal revision Petition No. 236 of the 1999 on the file of the learned 1 Additional Metropolitan sessions Judge, Hyderabad. The petitioner accordingly prays for a consequential direction to the respondent to refund the amount of Rs. 3,000/- to secure the ends of justice.

( 2 ) BEFORE adverting to the question as to whether the impugned orders suffers from any legal infirmity and as to whether the petitioner is entitled for the refund of the amount as prayed for, it may be necessary to briefly notice the relevant facts leading to filing to this petition.

( 3 ) THE respondent-State filed a charge- sheet against the petitioner-accused for the offence punishable under Section 9 of the andhra Prdaesh Gaming Act, 1974 (for short the Act ). In the complaint, it is inter alia alleged that on 6-2-1999 at about 8-00 p. m. , the petitioner-accused was found at New










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top