BILAL NAZKI
Raji Reddy – Appellant
Versus
A. P. S. R. T. C. , Secunderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) 121 petitioners filed this Writ petition by paying one set of Court-fee. Office has taken as objection;"please clarify as to how this W. P. is maintainable by paying a single set of Court-fee when there are 121 petitioners. "
( 2 ) THE counsel has replied the objection in the following terms;"last time we have filed two writ petitions by paying single Court-fee and matter is numbered and posted before the Hon ble Chief Justice Court. After hearing, directing the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition by rising all relevant points and accordingly the two Writ Petitions No. 27132 of 98 and 32450/98 were withdrawn. Hence this W. P. filed with all grounds. Therefore, this W. P. filed with permission of the Court in the aforesaid writ petition. Hence this W. P. may be numbered and post before Hon ble Court for admission. "office has sought orders from this Court as to whether single Court-fee is to be paid or the individual Court-fee has to be paid by each petitioner.
( 3 ) THE respondents have issued a notification which is published in local news papers on 31/03/1997. This notification has been challenged by all the petitioners. Therefore, the learned counsel f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.