SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 576

G.BIKSHAPATHY
Relangi Nageswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Tatha Chiranjeeva Rao – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE C. R. P. is filed against the orders of the learned Rent Control Appellate authority (Subordinate Judge) Eluru in c. M. A. No. 3 of 1994, dated 16-1-1995 confirming the Order of the learned Rent controller (Principal District Munsif, Eluru) in R. C. C. NO. 8 of 1984, dated 16-8-1994.

( 2 ) THE petitioners herein are the respondents before the Rent Controller in r. C. C. No. 8 of 1984 and the appellants in c. M. A. No. 3 of 1995. For the sake of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the Rent Controller are referred to herein.

( 3 ) THE petitioner laid a claim before the learned Rent Controller in R. C. C. No. 8 of 1984 seeking eviction of the respondents from the b schedule property and for delivery of vacant possession. The grounds in support of the claim were that the respondents-tenants committed default in payment of rent, that the denial of the title of the petitioner to the property was not bona fide, that they sublet the premises and they made material alterations to the suit schedule property. It was the case of the petitioner that he purchased the entire a schedule property of which b schedule property formed part of a portion. The 1st




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top