SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 566

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Shikha Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation, Hyderabad – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C. C. No, 120 of 1998 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, medchal, Ranga Reddy District. They invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this court and pray this Court to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 120 of 1998 on the file of the said Court.

( 2 ) BEFORE adverting to the question as to whether the petitioners are entitled for any relief, it may be necessary to briefly notice few relevant facts for the purpose of disposal of this petition.

( 3 ) THE second respondent herein filed complaint before the learned Judicial First class Magistrate, Medchal inter alia alleging that on 30-12-1997 the inspection squad consisting of Sri. M. S. Rama Krishna and the complainant and one Sri Sharada manjunadh, Office Superintendent of the e. S. I, have visited the factory of the accused to conduct inspection under the E. S. I. Act and the Regulations made thereunder. On the said date, both the petitioners herein were present in the factory premises and attended on the Inspectors. It is the case of the respondent-complainant that the squad comprising of two Inspectors and one superintendent demanded the a





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top