( 1 ) QUESTIONING the orders dated 20th May, 1993 of the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, made in M. P. No. 187 of 1992 directing the petitioner-Corporation to pay an amount of rs, 40,000/- under Section 33-C (2) of i. D. Act, 1947 (for short the Act ), the a. P. S. R. T. C. filed this writ petition.

( 2 ) THOUGH the dispute is squarelycovered by two Division Bench Judgments of this Court, the Standing Counsel for the petitioner-Corporation in her inimitable style tried to reopen the matter once again, which cannot be acceded to. However, as she has argued the matter, it is necessary to state the facts.

( 3 ) THE case of the petitioner-Corporationis that the respondent-workman was employed as a Driver on daily wage basis from 21-07-1989 and during the course of his employment he was involved in an accident on 09-04-1990. Thereafter, the petitioner was put-off duty from 10-04-1990 and a disciplinary enquiry was conducted against him for his involvement in the accident. Pursuant to the enquiry report, the services of the respondent- workman was disengaged from 09-07-1992. The question that now falls for consideration in this writ petition would be"whether the period