SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 601

VAMAN RAO
Pindtgantl Lakshminarayana – Appellant
Versus
Pindiganti Venkata Subbarao – Respondent


VAMAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is directed against the judgment rendered by the I Additional district Judge, Krishna District at machilipatnam, dated 12-10-1987 in A. S. No. 69 of 1981 under which the judgment and decree of the Court of the Principal district Munsiff, Avanigadda, dated 31-3-1981 passed in O. S. No. 107 of 1978 decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for declaration of title and possession has been confirmed.

( 2 ) THE appellant herein is defendant no. 3, who died during pendency of the appeal and appellants 2 to 4 have been brought on record as his legal representatives. Respondent No. l herein is the plaintiff, respondent No. 2 herein is defendant No. 4 and respondent No. 3 herein is defendant No. 2 in the suit. The first appellant in A. S. No. 69 of 1981 on the file of the I Additional District Court, who was defendant No. l in the suit, has not been impleaded in this appeal stating that he was not a necessary party. The plaintiff filed the suit for declaration and possession of the plaint schedule property and for recovery of past mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 25/ per month and future mesne profits at the same rate.

( 3 ) THE case of the plaintiff is that





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top