SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 661

V.V.S.RAO
K. Jayaramaiah Chetty – Appellant
Versus
SSPL. DY. COLLECTOR AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER T. T. D. – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks a Writ of mandamus directing the Tirumala-Tirupati devasthanams ( ttd for brevity) to provide alternate accommodation at anantapalli Gunta area of Tirumala Hills or any other alternate accommodation. At the outset, it is necessary to observe that the petitioner has pleaded or proved neither existing nor subsisting right nor legal entitlement to seek such mandamus. Indeed, he has not even sought for a declaration that he is entitled to seek alternative accommodation.

( 2 ) BE that as it may, when the vacate stay petition being WVMP. No. 3436 of 1999 filed by TTD was taken up for consideration, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for TTD requested that the matter be finally disposed of. Hence the matter is being disposed of at the interlocutory stage.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is a tenant of Urtaradi vaishnava Moola Mutt (hereafter called the mutt ) in respect of 650 Sq. yds. of land comprised in T. S. No. 5, Ward No. 3, and block C of North Mada Street in Tirumala hills. He is running a lodge in the name and style of ayyappa Nilayam . In furtherance of a scheme to provide more wider approach roads to the te


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top