( 1 ) THIS appeal suit is directed against the judgment dated 27-4-1992 in O. S. No. 66 of 1989 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Sathupalli under which the plaintiff s suit for specific performance of the contract in respect of the plaint schedule property has been dismissed.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts of this appeal may be stated briefly as follows :the appellant is the plaintiff in the suit and the respondents are the defendants. The parties shall be referred to as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff filed the instant suit for the specific performance of contract of sale in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the suit schedule property against the defendants. The case of the plaintiff is that the 2nd defendant is the mother and the third defendant is the wife and the fourth and fifth defendants are the sons of the first defendant. The first defendant on his behalf and on behalf of his sons, namely, 4th and 5th defendants, who were minors at the relevant time and the 2nd and 3rd defendants agreed to sell the suit property in favour of the plaintiff for a consideration of Rs. 75,000. 00 on 19-5-1983. It is stated that the plaintiff was already in possession of the said house as a tenan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document