SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 152

A.GOPAL REDDY, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
S. Abdul Razack – Appellant
Versus
Mandal Revenue Officer, Kollur – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the decretal order passed by the Additional senior Civil Judge, Kurnool in O. P. No. 60 of 1988 dated 22-4-1993.

( 2 ) THE brief facts which are necessary to dispose of the appeal are as follows: An extent of Ac. 10-71 cents in S. Nos. 373/1a, 373/1-C and 373/3 situate at Kallur village was acquired for the purpose of house-sites to the weaker sections of the society by issuing notification under Section 4 (1) of the land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the the Act ). The appellant and the second respondent filed their claims statements pursuant to the notice issued under section 9 of the Act. The Wakf Board filed a claim statement stating that the entire property stands registered as wakf land of budda Buddi Mosque in the village account no. 10 (1) of Kallur village under the control and administration of A. P. State Wakf board. The Mutavallis or Inamdars do not have any alienable rights in the said land, as it is a service inam land granted for service rendered at Mosque and entire rights of management vest only in the Wakf Board. The said lands have been surveyed by the wakf Commissioner appointed by the government of A






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top