SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 380

T.CH.SURYA RAO
Public Prosecutor, HYD. – Appellant
Versus
P. Vigneshwar Rao – Respondent


T. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against acquittal preferred by the State represented by the public Prosecutor against the Judgment dated 24th July, 1996 passed by the learned judicial Magistrate of First Class Spl. Mobile court, Mahabubnagar, in C. C. No. 256 /1994.

( 2 ) THE accused-respondent was charged for the offences under Sections 468, 471 and 420, IPC on the allegation that he forged the s. S. C. Certificate for the purpose of seeking appointment in APSRTC (for brevity "the corporation ) as Conductor and used the forged document as genuine certificate with dishonest intention and induced the department by delivering the certificate and therefore liable for punishment for the said offences. He pleaded not guilty of the charges when the charges were read over and explained to him. During the course of the trial, three witnesses P. Ws. 1 to 3 were examined on the side of prosecution and exs. P-1 to P-6 were marked.

( 3 ) THE case of the prosecution as seen from the testimony of the witnesses, in brief, is that pursuant to the notification issued by the Divisional Manager, Mahabubnagar division of the Corporation, the accused, and several others applied for the posts of






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top