SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 401

T.CH.SURYA RAO
Pottem Subbarayudu – Appellant
Versus
Kothapalli Gangulu Naidu – Respondent


T. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiffs have preferred this appeal against the judgment and Decree dated 24-03-1987 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, tirupathi, in O. S. No. 136 of 1979. Respondents 1 to 7 herein are the defendants in the suit. The other respondents have been brought on record as the legal representatives of the deceased one or the other respondents during the pendency of the proceedings.

( 2 ) IT is expedient to refer the parties as they are originally arrayed in the suit so as to avoid any confusion and for better understanding of the matter.

( 3 ) THE factual matrix, necessary and germane for adjudicating the contentious issues between the parties inter se may be stated thus: The suit O. S. No. 136 of 1979 was filed seeking a decree for specific performance of the suit agreement of sale- dated 04-11-1978 mentioning inter alia in the plaint that defendants 1 to 3 purchased the lands in an extent of Ac. 13-14 cts, ( b schedule lands for brevity) from the defendants 4 to 7 under an agreement of sale dated 05-05-1974 for a sum of rs. 1,20,000/- as per the terms stipulated therein inter alia and the defendants 4 to 7 received the sale pri






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top