( 1 ) THE petitioner is an association of the parents of the girls studying in Residential school established and managed by the 2nd respondent-Society. The petitioner assails the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc. No. A4/145/99-2000 dated 17-2-2000 and prays for a mandamus declaring the proposal to shift the first respondent-School from Peddapuram to tuni as illegal, arbitrary and void and for a further consequential relief to direct the respondents to continue the school at peddapuram only.

( 2 ) THE 2nd respondent established residential Schools for boys and girls separately at various places. One such school was established at Kakinada. The school was later shifted during 1990-91 to peddapuram. The school is now housed in rented premises. According to the petitioner-Association, the school premises at Peddapuram has adequate infrastructural facilities. The residents spent about Rs. 5 lakhs for construction of bathrooms, kitchen, washing platforms etc. , and as such, it is alleged there is no necessity to shift the first respondent-School from Peddapuram. The petitioner- association learnt that arrangements are being made to shift the schbol to Tuni