SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 430

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
K. Umeshwar rep. by G. P. A. S. S. Sonwalkar – Appellant
Versus
Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. , Hyderabad – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this writ petition prays for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent- corporation in "not conducting the enquiry against the 5th respondent which will reveal why the petitioner has resigned under duress, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of natural justice. . . " The petitioner prays for a consequential direction directing the respondent- corporation to re-instate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits. A very peculiar prayer indeed.

( 2 ) BEFORE adverting to the question as to whether the petitioner is entitled for any relief at all, it may be necessary to notice the relevant facts and the background leading to filing of this writ petition.

( 3 ) THE affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is sworn and signed by one satish Shannkararao Sonwalker s/o late s. J. Sonwalkar, a retired employee of the corporation in his capacity as the Power of attorney holder of the petitioner. The petitioner himself appeared in person before the Court along with his power of attorney agent. This Court at the time of hearing of the matter expressed its opinion that it will be better, if t
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top