SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 431

C.V.N.SASTRY
B. Chitra Ramacharandas etc – Appellant
Versus
National Remote Sensing Agency – Respondent


C. V. N. SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals can be disposed of by a common judgment as the question involved is one and the same and the facts of the two cases are identical.

( 2 ) THE appeals arise out of two suits filed by two different landlords, owning separate portions of the same building, against their common tenant for eviction and for mesne profits or damages for use and occupation.

( 3 ) IT is not in dispute that the suit premises were leased out by the plaintiffs to the defendant under separate lease agreements dated 16-2-1979 for a period of two years with effect from 16-4-1978 on payment of rent at the rate of Rs. 0. 63 ps. per sq. ft. The lease period expired by 15-4-1980. Before the expiry of the lease period i. e. , on 7-1-1980, the defendant addressed a letter to the plaintiffs seeking extension/renewal of the leases. On 20-1-1980 the plaintiffs sent a reply stating that extension of the leases will be considered only on payment of rent at the rate of Rs. 2. 00 per sq. ft. A joint meeting was held in March 1980 in which the defendant offered to increase the rent only by Rs. 0. 10 ps. per sq. ft. as against the plaintiffs demand of Rs. 2. 00 per sq. ft. The plaintif












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top