SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 180

Kannapu Reddy Venkata Subbareddy – Appellant
Versus
Gopavaram Rama Krishna Reddy – Respondent


C. V. N. SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal by the sole defendant in the suit is directed against a reversing Judgment. The sole respondent-plaintiff has filed the suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 17,294-24 ps. on the foot of a promissory note dated 6-5-83 ex ecuted by the defendant in his favour for a sum of rs. 10,054. 79 ps. repayable with interest @ 24% per annum.

( 2 ) THE defendant while admitting the execution of the suit pronote pleaded that no cash was lent under the suit pronote, but the same was executed in renewal of prior promissory notes. According to him, he initially borrowed Rs. 2,000/- only under a pro-note dated 5-6-74, which was renewed by executing a fresh pronote dated 30-5-77 for Rs. 3,432/ -. That on 30-5-80, he made a part payment of Rs. 20/- thereunder, which was endorsed thereon, and ultimately on 6-5-83, the suit pronote was obtained by the plaintiff for Rs. 10,054. 79 ps. calculating interest at 24% p. a. from the inception. The defendant further pleaded that he was an agriculturist and as such interest is liable to be scaled down from the inception, as per andhra Pradesh Agriculturist Relief Act IV of 38 (for Short act IV of 38 ). He also pleade








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top