SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 687

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, GHULAM MOHAMMED
T. Hari Kumar Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Prameela – Respondent


GHULAM MOHAMMED, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant and the respondent are the husband and wife. The marriage between them was held on 10-3-1989 according to the Hindu rites and customs and they lived together as husband and wife at their permanent residence at Bansilalpet, Secunderabad. During the wedlock they begot two children namely Vikram and another child who were aged about 21/2 years and 4 months respectively at the time of filing of the above O. P. It is alleged by the appellant that the respondent-wife, who was suffering from mental disorder and attempted to commit suicide, and has not shown any interest though he made all endeavours to lead the happy married life. Her acts and behaviour, it is stated, are dangerous both to the appellant and the children and there is no safety as the respondent is suffering from Schizophrenia.

( 2 ) THE appellant-husband, therefore, filed O. P. No. 75 of 1991 before the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad at Secunderabad under Section 13 (1) (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce on the ground that the respondent-wife was suffering from Schizophrenia-mental disorder.

( 3 ) THE respondent filed a counter-affidavit denying the all



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top