SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 681

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
K. Susheela – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in the instant writ petition impugns the proceedings on the file of the Regional Joint Commissioner of Endowments, Multi Zone-III, Hyderabad directing the petitioner herein to show-cause as to why the legality, the propriety of the order passed by the Asstt. Commissioner, Endowments Department, T. C. , Hyderabad declaring the petitioner herein as member of the founder family of Sri Kanaka Durga Temple, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, should not be examined. The petitioner herein was called upon to be present together with connected records and documents in connection with the proposed enquiry to be held on 28-12-1999 by the Regional Joint Commissioner.

( 2 ) IT is stated that the petitioner s husband was the devotee of Sri Kanaka Durga Devi. It is stated that with his own funds, the temple in question has been constructed by his individual efforts. It is, however, stated that the temple has become public in character for the reason that the public have been allowed to have access for worship of the subject temple. It is also stated that the petitioner s husband undertook construction of several sub-shrines like Pochamma Temple, Santhoshima Temple. Th





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top