SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 716

VAMAN RAO
T. Krishnaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Maniyamma – Respondent


VAMAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 31-8-1999 passed by the X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I. A. No. 612 of 1999 in I. A. No. 1931 of 1996 in OS No. 1667 of 1989 under which the said I. A. No. 612 of 1999 purported to have been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in representing the application for restoring I. A. No. 1931 of 1996, which was dismissed for default, has been dismissed.

( 2 ) NEITHER the memorandum of civil revision petition nor the order passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge contains the necessary details as to for what purpose the I. A. No. 1931 of 1996 was filed. However, on behalf of the petitioner, an affidavit has been filed in this Court giving certain particulars leading to this civil revision petition.

( 3 ) IT appears the petitioner herein has filed O. S. No. 1667 of 1989 before the X Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for declaration of title and perpetual injunction in respect of certain property. A Petition in I. A. No. 119 of 1946 has been filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of C. P. C. seeking to add the relief of possession and cancellation of the sale dee





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top