SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 801

DIST. COLLECTOR, R. R. DIST. – Appellant
Versus
KADICHERLA NARSIMHA – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) A. 11 these appeals are filed against the common judgment of the learned Single judge dated 17-7-1998 made in W. P. Nos. 35173, 35225 and 35496 of 1997.

( 2 ) THE facts in nutshell for disposal ofthese appeals are as follows: the petitioners in W. P. Nos. 35173 and 35225 of 1997 claimed that they were assigned Ac. 3-00 cents of dry land each in s-No. 59 of Kondapur village, serilingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy district (formerly Hyderabad District) by the Tahsildar in proceedings No. A9/10897/ 61 dated 13-12-1961 under Rule 9{g) of laoni Rules, 1950 and petitioners father in w. P. No. 35496/97 was assigned Ac. 4-21 guntas in S. Nos. 2, 3, 18 and 217 of kondapur village in proceedings no. A9/10899 dated 13-12-1961. Ever since from the date of assignment they have been in possession and enjoyment of the said land by paying land revenue to the government for the last 36 years and thus they are the lawful owners of the said land having participated in the auction and paid the bid amount towards the sale consideration. Inspite of the said assignment long back, the authorities have not carried out mutation in their favour except showing their possession. They mad









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top