SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 786

VAMAN RAO
Ponnaboyina Narasimham – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , Irrigation Dept. – Respondent


VAMAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks a declaration that the action of the respondents in taking steps to acquire the lands of the petitioners to construct a Water Course without following the procedure contemplated under Andhra pradesh Irrigation (Construction and maintenance of Water Courses)Act (hereinafter called the Act ) and rules made thereunder is illegal and for appropriate direction for stopping the action of the respondents in that regard.

( 2 ) THE plea of the petitioners is that the 2nd respondent has taken steps for acquiring the lands for constructing certain irrigation works in contravention of the provisions of the said Act. Counters have been filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. It is specifically stated in the counters and it has been assured by the learned government Pleader concerned that the lands sought to be acquired are for the purpose of construction of minor irrigation tanks and not for construction of irrigation channels. A perusal of the affidavit of the petitioners also discloses that nowhere it has been alleged that the petitioners lands were being acquired for constructing any irrigation channel. In th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top