SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 876

V.V.S.RAO
Dadi Reddy Sivanarayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kasi Reddy Chinnamma – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dt. 18-7-2000 in O. S. No. 337 of 1998. By the said order the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge sustained the objection of the counsel for defendant for marking the suit document and held that the suit document is unregistered sale deed and hence it is inadmissible in evidence.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows:the plaintiff-revision petitioner (hereinafter called the plaintiff) filed a suit against the respondent-defendant (hereafter called the defendant ) for specific performance of agreement of sale dt. 15-4-1984 executed by the defendant in respect of agricultural land in S. No. 201/1 admeasuring Ac. 1. 60 cents situated at Gillella village, Proddutur Mandal. The plaintiff also sought the relief of permanent injunction. During the trial, when the plaintiff sought to mark the document dt. 15-4-1984 the counsel for the defendant raised objection that the suit document is sale deed and for want of registration and proper stamp duty, the same is not admission in evidence. Therefore, the trial Court heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff as well. It was contended for the plaintiff that tho

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top