SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 928

S.B.SINHA
Vaka Punnamma – Appellant
Versus
Yadavalli Jurala Narasimham – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE civil revision petition is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 6th november, 1997 passed by the District munsif, Nandigama, in E. P. No. 36 of 1993 arising out of O. S. No. 42 of 1987 whereby and whereunder an application for attachment of the property filed by the decreeholder-opposite party in terms of order 21 Rule 54 and Order 21 Rules 64 and 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was disposed of directing as follows:"perused the evidence on record and as per the evidence of P. W. 1, the property under attachment was assigned to the J. Dr. in the year 1980 and since 10 years is elapsed. She has got salable interest and therefore the property is liable for sale. Whereas r. W. 1, the son of J. Dr. deposed to the effect that the J. Dr. has no salable interest in the property in question since it was assigned by the government. As per the evidence from both sides no doubt the property under attachment was assigned to the j. Dr. But since already 10 years ceiling period is elapsed from the date of assignment in the year 1980. The J. Dr. has got salable interest in the said property and, therefore, it is liable for sale for the recover of the decretal a




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top