B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision under Article 227 of the constitution of India raises a jurisdictional point regarding the maintainability of O. S. No. 100 of 1997 on the file of the family Court, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) MR. Mohd. Zia-Ul-Haque, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was the husband of the 2nd respondent, but the marriage between them was disolved on 12-2-1997. After the 2nd respondent ceased to be the wife of the petitioner, she had institued the above Suit on the file of the 1st respondent-Family in respect of the suit schedule house on the premise that she is the absolute owner and exclusive possessor of the same and that the petitioner has got no right, title or interest over the same.

( 3 ) THE suit schedule house was the matrimonial home where both the petitioner and the 2nd respondent resided and since the dissolution of the marriage, a dispute has ensured inter se the parties, each party is claiming that it has got title and possession in the property in question.

( 4 ) MR. Mohd. Zia-Ul-Haque, further submits that the Family Court had erred in entertaining the said suit for the reason that the moment there was a dissolution of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document