B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, GHULAM MOHAMMED
Chintalapati Ramalinga Raju – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Eluru, W. G. District – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ appeal arises against an order passed by the learned Single Judge of this court in W. P. No. 20544 of 1999 dated 11-10-1999.
( 2 ) THE matter arises under the provisions of the A. P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer regulations, 1959 (for short the regulations ). The Learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the apprehension of the petitioner may not be real. But, it is evident from the proceedings dated 4-11-1998 in Rc. No. 230 of 1997 (Supt.) of the Mandal Revenue officer, Buttaigudem mandal addressed to the Special Deputy Tahsildar, Tribal welfare, K. R. Puram that action was sought to be taken against the petitioner on the ground that the judgment rendered by the special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare hitherto dated 5-9-1981 is doubtful. But, it is a well settled law that when a judgment is rendered under the Regulations, it becomes final and there is no review of the same. It is not disputed that the order dated 5-9-1981 rejecting the application for eviction of the petitioner-appellant herein on the ground that unauthorised possession was rejected and the said order had become final. It is also not disputed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.