Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Hyd – Appellant
Versus
Agrasen Syntex Private Ltd. , Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) IN these applications under Section 35-G (3) of the Central Excise Act, the Revenue seeks reference of the following question of law framed by the learned Standing Counsel. Whether the penalty provisions of the central Excise Act, 1944 are applicable to the administration of Central Excise duty under the Additional Duties of excise (Goods of Special Importance) act, 1957 or not?
( 2 ) THE Tribunal declined to refer the question to the High Court. The Tribunal followed the Division Bench decision of the delhi High Court in Pioneer Silk Mills private Limited v. Union of India, 1995 (80) elt 507, and held that in the absence of a specific provision for levy and collection of penalty under the provisions of Additional duties of Excise (HGoods of Special importance) Act, 1957, the penalty provisions contained in the Central Excise Act cannot be read into the provisions of the former act. The view taken by the Delhi High court is fully supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in Khemka and Company v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1975 SC 1549, wherein the Supreme Court held that despite Section 9 (2) of the Central Sales tax Act, in the absence of a specif
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.