SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 103

D.S.R.VERMA, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Mandadi Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
Dist. Collector, Hyderabad District – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants herein filed writ petitions praying for a writ to quash the communication dated 3-4-1998 of the mandal Revenue Officer, Marredpally, hyderabad District (R. 3) addressed to the sub-Registrar, Bowenpally (R. 4) requesting the latter to stop registration of documents in respect of S. No. 74, Marredpally paigah village till the disposal of the Land Grab case. It is stated in the said letter that survey No. 74 is a Government land and a case has been filed in the Special Court against Housing Societies which have occupied the Government land. The petitioners presented the sale deeds executed by certain persons who got the plots in question from Ravi Co-operative housing Society Limited. The details of the registered sale deeds in favour of the vendors of the petitioners are furnished by the petitioners. The Sub-Registrar kept the registration pending and declined to release the documents after due endorsement of registration. The petitioners therefore filed the writ petitions and interim order was sought for to direct the 4th respondent to register and release the documents i. e. , the sale deeds. The learned single Judge dismissed the WPMP



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top