SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 90

A.GOPAL REDDY, MOTILAL B.NAIK
Lokeshwari – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasa Rao – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) C. M. A. No. 1082 of 1996 arises out of an order passed by the Court of Subordinate Judge, Kavali in O. P. No. 2 of 1988 filed by the husband under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and C. M. A. No. 1257 of 1996 arises out of an order passed by the same Court in O. P. No. 85 of 1988 filed by the wife under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights. The learned Subordinate Judge, Kavali allowed, O. P. No. 2 of 1988 filed by the husband and granted a decree of divorce between the parties and dismissed O. P. No. 85 of 1988 filed by the wife for restitution of conjugal rights, by a common order dated 28-9-1995. The wife has filed these two appeals aggrieved by the common order passed by the Court below in the two respective O. Ps.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties are addressed to as the wife and husband.

( 3 ) THE appellant-wife and respondent- husband are doctors by profession. Their marriage took place on 19 -3-1981 at Secunderabad as per custom and usage. The wife joined the society of the husband eight months after the marriage. Initially, both of them lived together at Kavali for about fou








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top