( 1 ) THE Writ Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1-11-2000, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby and whereunder, the writ petition being w. P. No. 10048 of 2000, filed by writ petitioners-respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein was disposed of in the manner following:"in the impugned order, the first respondent himself directed the second respondent to take action in accordance with Section 32 of the Act. The only objection of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the various observations made by the first respondent would not leave anything to be decided by the second respondent in the enquiry. Therefore, as directed by the first respondent, the matter shall stand remitted to the second respondent who shall decide the application of respondents 3 and 4 in accordance with law. He shall decide the same without being influenced by the report submitted by the MRO or by any of the observations made by the first respondent in the impugned order. "

( 2 ) WITH a view to dispose of this writ appeal, it is necessary to state the basic facts of the case. The appellants, who were in possession of the land in question, abandoned it, and created a lease in favour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document