S. B. SINHA. C. J.

( 1 ) THE only question which arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the constructions raised by the petitioner could have been demolished for the purpose of widening of the road without the consent of the appellant.

( 2 ) BEFORE the learned Single Judge the respondent herein had relied upon a letter dated 10-8-2000 wherein some authority purported to act on behalf of the commissioner alleging:"sir/madam, sub: MCH:tp:sec:cir-V - Road widening from Tolichowki Junction to darga (MCH limits) - Affected portion under Road Widening - Reg. With reference to the above subject, it was discussed in personally and taken over the possession in respect of premises No. 8-1-328 at Toli Chowki, hyderabad to an extent of area 4279. 74 sq. Mt. and same sketch plan is enclosed, thank you for the co-operation extended and the MCH will consider your request as per the G. O. Ms. No. 483-MA dated 24-8-1998 for considering in accordance to Rules. Thanking you. "the contents of the said letter had been denied and disputed by the writ petitioner-appellant. According to the writ petitioner-appellant the said letter was issued by way of a ploy. In this aforementioned sit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document