SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 11

V.BHASKARA RAO
Mahanti Pentayya – Appellant
Versus
Kella Sanyasappalanaidu – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision Petition is directed against the order in IA No. 179 of 1997 in OS No. 168 of 1983 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram dated 4-2-1998 appointing an Advocate Commissioner for localisation of the plaint schedule property with the assistance of a qualified Mandal Surveyor. Plaintiff No. l in the suit is the Revision Petitioner and Plaintiff No. 2 is impleaded as 3rd Respondent in this revision.

( 2 ) THE Respondent Nos. l and 2 herein, who are the defendants in the suit filed the above petition under Order XXVI, Rules 9 and 10, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking appointment of Advocate-Commissioner to localise the plaint schedule property and to draw a plan with the assistance of a licensed Surveyor. It is stated in the affidavit of Respondent No. l herein that he had filed a similar petition earlier and the same was dismissed. But, he is of the opinion that there is any amount of necessity for appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner with reference to the sale deeds filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff, as otherwise it is not possible to the trial Court to come to a just finding. The Revision












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top