SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 77

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
B. Sailesh – Appellant
Versus
Osmania University – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in the instant writ petition prays for issuance of an appropriate writ particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the first respondent in No. 581/be/exams MP/98 dt. 23-11-1998 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to publish the result of the petitioner enabling him to pursue the further course of B. E.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a first year engineering student. The first year examinations of B. E. were started in the last week of August, 1998. On 4-9-1998 the petitioner was writing the Physics examination at M. J. College of Engineering, panjagutta. It is his case that before entering the calculations on the answer sheet he was doing the rough work on his palm of left hand and also on the question paper in a normal manner. There was no attempt by him to copy from any material and he did not possess any prohibited material in his possession. The petitioner s answer sheet was taken by the Invigilator and his hall ticket was also seized. Consequently he was not allowed to write the paper on 7-9-1998. However, under the directions of this Court in W. P. No. 25358/1998 the petitioner i












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top