SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 59

R.M.BAPAT
C. RAMACHANDRA NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
M. RAJAMMA – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein was the plaintiff. He had instituted the suit against the defendants ie. , the respondents herein, in O. S. No. 301 of 1989 which is pending on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati. The said suit was filed for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 24-4-1989 and also to put the plaintiff in possession of the suit schedule property.

( 2 ) ON completion of formalities, the evidence commenced. The plaintiff produced the document i. e. , agreement of sale, which was exhibited in the evidence. After few days, the plaintiff filed an application i. e. , I. A. No. 1332/97 under Section 38 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with a prayer to send the agreement of sale to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati for levying and collecting stamp duty as it was inadequately stamped. The defendants-respondents herein filed their counter and resisted LA. No. 1332/97. The learned Judge heard the matter on merits and refused to send the agreement of sale to the Revenue Divisional Officer. Aggrieved by the said order, the present revision has been filed.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel Mr. A. T. M. Rangaramanujam appearing on behalf of t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top