SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 105

VAMAN RAO
Pentapati Venkata Satyanarayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


VAMAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of the Additional District Judge (Special Judge for the offences under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act), Vizianagaram dated 6-4-1993 rendered in CC No. 22 of 1992 under which the accused has been convicted for contravention of Section 8 (c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 punishable under Section 15 of the Act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000. 00and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant to the appeal may be stated briefly as follows :on 28-3-1988 at about 10. 00a. m. on the strength of some information PW1 the Excise Sub-Inspector, PW5 the then Assistant Commissioner of Enforcement, PW2-another Excise Sub-Inspector, PW4-the then Excise Sub-Inspector, Enforcement, Visakhapatnam PW5, the Assistant Commissioner of Excise, Enforcement, Vizag and some other staff members went to the premises of Kranthi Road Transport Private Limited, Vizianagaram situated in Bonda Street. The accused was the branch-in-charge of that company at Vizianagaram, who was present when the






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top