SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 102

BILAL NAZKI
D. Ramalinga Reddy and D. Babu – Appellant
Versus
vs State Of A. P. – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the appellant as well as the Public Prosecutor.

( 2 ) THE appellant has been convicted for the offences under Section 341 of IPC and also under Section 3 (1) (xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The facts which lead to the prosecution of the appellant are that, one Smt. Mekala Rajamma who belongs to Yanadi caste reported that on 9-11-1993 at about 10. 00 a. m. she collected cow dung in a basket and went towards the outskirts of the village to dump it on the manure heep, the heep was to the south of her house in her land. After dumping, she went to attend the calls of nature in the land of Nallapa Reddy Bhaskar Reddy. While returning the accused met her, after chit chatting for a while he caught hold of her hand, she admonished him, the accused gagged her mouth and said, "hey Yanadi prostitute come, I want to fulfill my ardent desire". After saying these words he dragged her towards him. She also stated that, the accused dragged her to the land of Bhaskar Reddy in which crop had been raised. She struggled and in that process her blouse was torn. She also stated that, at that time on









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top