SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 98

S.V.MARUTHI
T. RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
LAXMAMMA – Respondent


S. V. MARUTHI, J.

( 1 ) THESE three Second Appeals are disposed of by a common judgment as they arise out of a common judgment and the parties are same.

( 2 ) THE subject matter of the three suits is the land admeasuring 1 acre 3 guntas in Sy. No. 143,12 guntas in Sy. No. 144,2 acres 11 guntas in Sy. No. 145, 4 guntas in Sy,no. 146,1 acre" 10 guntas in Sy. No. 147,1 acre 27 guntas in Sy. No. 155,1 acre 30 guntas in Sy. No. 249,3 acres 34 guntas in Sy. No. 282 and 9 guntas in Sy. No. 372 in all admeasuring 13 acres 31 guntas of Nizampet village of Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy district.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs in O. S. No. 136/87 are the appellants in all the three Secondappeals. The plaintiffs filed O. S. No. 136/87 for partition and separate possession of half share of the plaint schedule properties. The suit was decreed against which A. S. No. 73/94 was filed which was allowed. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiffs filed S. A. No. 654/97. The plaintiffs in O. S. No. 136/87 also filed O. S. No. 58/89 for injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the plaint schedule properties. The District Munsiff decreed the suit against which A. S. 13/95 was filed. Since A. S. No. 73/






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top