SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 88

R.M.BAPAT
Karamalakunta Kadiramma – Appellant
Versus
Karamalakunta Dasappa – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant herein was the second plaintiff and the respondents herein were the defendants in O. S. No. 49 of 1993 which was pending on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Madanapalle. The appellant herein along with her father instituted the above suit in the Court of the Prl. District Munsif, madanapalle against the respondents herein. The suit was filed for permanent injunction. On evidence, the learned trial Judge dismissed the suit. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in O. S. No. 49 of 1993, the plaintiffs carried the matter in appeal by filing A. S. No. 132 of 1997 in the Court of the Additional district Judge, Madanapalle. The learned Judge dismissed the appeal and confirmed the decree and judgment passed by the trial Judge. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in A. S. No. 132/97, the appellant herein has preferred the Second Appeal before this Court.

( 2 ) INITIALLY there were two plaintiffs. The 1st plaintiff, who was the father of the 2nd plaintiff, died during the pendency of the first appeal. She being the sole heir, the appeal was prosecuted by her.

( 3 ) ON presentation of the appeal, notice was issued to the respondents.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top