SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 249

J.CHELAMESWAR
Y. Raghavendra – Appellant
Versus
NRT University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada – Respondent


J. CHALAMESWAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of writ petitions are filed challenging the action of the first respondent praying this Court :". . . . may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the procedure adopted by the University authorities in making the selection and admission into the 1st Year MBBS Course for the academic year 1998-99 is contrary to law and illegal and consequently set aside the provisional admissions made in pursuance of the Notification dated 21-11-1998 and further direct the respondent University to make the selection strictly in accordance with the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in Ritesh R. Sah case and grant such other relief, as this Hon ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. "

( 2 ) IT is agreed by all the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the various parties that Writ Petition No. 33489 of 1998 can be treated as representative of all the Writ Petitions and the facts as averred in the said writ petition be taken as the basic facts for the purpose of determining the issue. All the petitioners claim to belong to Backward Classes and claim that the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top