SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 327

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, T.CH.SURYA RAO
C. Panduranga Rao – Appellant
Versus
V. Shyamala Rao – Respondent


T. CH. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 16-2-1996 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in CCCA No. 115 of 1987 and CCCA No. 106 of 1985. Those appeals inturn have been filed against the common judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in OS No. 16/1983 and 17/83 dated 29-6-1985.

( 2 ) THE appellant herein Sri C. Panduranga Rao, filed the suit OS No. 17 of 83 for specific performance of the suit agreement of sale against Sri V. Syamala Rao and T. Chandra Mouli the respondents herein. It is better to refer the respondents by names to avoid any confusion. Sri T. Chandra Mouli filed the second suit OS No. 16 of 83 for eviction and damages for use and occupation against the appellant. The said Syamala Rao, the original owner of the suit house, is the 1st defendant in OS No. 17 of 83 and the 2nd defendant in OS No. 16 of 83 and 1st and 2nd respondent respectively in the corresponding Appeals. The appellant filed the suit OS No. 17/83 for specific performance of the suit agreement of sale dated 22-1-1977 executed by the said V. Syamala Rao in his favour on the premise that the said Syamala Rao executed the suit agreement of sale da










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top